Difference between revisions of "H+Pedia:Article Ratings"

From H+Pedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Featured)
(Criteria)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Featured ==
 
== Featured ==
 
=== Criteria ===
 
=== Criteria ===
Reviewed, good articles that are related to the [[H+Pedia]] core mission may feature on the home page.
+
Reviewed, good articles that are related to the may feature on the home page.
 +
 
 +
Articles should be an examples of quality H+Pedia article that the site aspires to and be closely aligned with the [[H+Pedia]] mission.
  
Articles should be an examples of quality H+Pedia article that the site aspires to.
 
 
=== Assessment ===
 
=== Assessment ===
 
Summaries should be written for [[Template:Featured]]. Ask an administrator to promote your featured article summary into the featured articles template.
 
Summaries should be written for [[Template:Featured]]. Ask an administrator to promote your featured article summary into the featured articles template.

Revision as of 12:45, 2 September 2018

There is an emergent article ratings system.

Featured

Criteria

Reviewed, good articles that are related to the may feature on the home page.

Articles should be an examples of quality H+Pedia article that the site aspires to and be closely aligned with the H+Pedia mission.

Assessment

Summaries should be written for Template:Featured. Ask an administrator to promote your featured article summary into the featured articles template.

The article itself can be tagged with {{Featured article|Article name}} to show a logo that it's this a featured articles.

Such articles end up in category: Category:Featured articles

Good

Criteria

Good articles have the potential to be become featured articles.

Articles should not feature too many red links, uncited sources or poor formatting.

Assessment

Tag such articles in Category:Good articles

They likely need a feature summary written up underneath Template:Featured and may require some final copy editing.

Other

These standards have not yet been defined.