Difference between revisions of "Talk:H+Pedia:Article Ratings"

From H+Pedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(โ†’โ€ŽOther ratings: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
I thought of adding a special category for a highly SEO ranked article, maybe a [[Church of Google]] inspired logo? [[User:Deku-shrub|Deku-shrub]] ([[User talk:Deku-shrub|talk]]) 17:03, 11 September 2018 (CDT)
 
I thought of adding a special category for a highly SEO ranked article, maybe a [[Church of Google]] inspired logo? [[User:Deku-shrub|Deku-shrub]] ([[User talk:Deku-shrub|talk]]) 17:03, 11 September 2018 (CDT)
 +
 +
I'm just brainstorming so far, but I have an idea: The "5 Plus" rating system.
 +
 +
1+ For completeness
 +
1+ For article/page depth
 +
1+ For social impact (links out/in or whatever)
 +
1+ For number of contributors (like the Westworld page would get one for this easily)
 +
1+ For something else I haven't thought of yet. Perhaps clarity and/or spelling/grammar? A featured article should be free of errors and easy to read I feel.
 +
 +
1/2 stars could also be awarded, an article must be rated at least 4.5+ in order to be considered for featuring.
 +
 +
I don't ''think'' we need to a different rating system for different types of article as mentioned above, that might over-complicate it?
 +
 +
Just a thought. LMK what ya think. ๐Ÿ™‚ --[[User:TranshumanTees|TranshumanTees]] ([[User talk:TranshumanTees|talk]]) 17:32, 12 September 2018 (CDT)

Revision as of 17:32, 12 September 2018

Specific rating types

We will need criteria for:

  • Media/reviews
  • Organisations
  • Ideas
  • More?

Deku-shrub (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2018 (CDT)

Other ratings

I thought of adding a special category for a highly SEO ranked article, maybe a Church of Google inspired logo? Deku-shrub (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2018 (CDT)

I'm just brainstorming so far, but I have an idea: The "5 Plus" rating system.

1+ For completeness 1+ For article/page depth 1+ For social impact (links out/in or whatever) 1+ For number of contributors (like the Westworld page would get one for this easily) 1+ For something else I haven't thought of yet. Perhaps clarity and/or spelling/grammar? A featured article should be free of errors and easy to read I feel.

1/2 stars could also be awarded, an article must be rated at least 4.5+ in order to be considered for featuring.

I don't think we need to a different rating system for different types of article as mentioned above, that might over-complicate it?

Just a thought. LMK what ya think. ๐Ÿ™‚ --TranshumanTees (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2018 (CDT)