Difference between revisions of "Talk:Opposition to genetically modified food"
Deku-shrub (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Hey, so obviously I just rewrote a lot of where you were going with the page. I'm afraid I don't agree that there is a unified opposition of both genetically engineered foods...") |
Deku-shrub (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, so obviously I just rewrote a lot of where you were going with the page. I'm afraid I don't agree that there is a unified opposition of both genetically engineered foods and humans as a single movement. If anything this falls under general technoconservatism and neo-luddism, so we have the categories for this. | Hey, so obviously I just rewrote a lot of where you were going with the page. I'm afraid I don't agree that there is a unified opposition of both genetically engineered foods and humans as a single movement. If anything this falls under general technoconservatism and neo-luddism, so we have the categories for this. | ||
| − | Opposition to human genetic engineering of course needs to be captured, to more broadly capture [[Proposed international ban on human genetic engineering]] for example. I hope you're okay with these changes [[User:Deku-shrub|Deku-shrub]] ([[User talk:Deku-shrub|talk]]) 13:06, 21 January 2016 (CST) | + | Opposition to human genetic engineering of course needs to be captured, to more broadly capture [[Proposed international ban on human genetic engineering]] for example. I hope you're okay with these changes |
| + | |||
| + | Additionally, I don't consider this as opposition to transhumanism in the food sense, only when we talk about people - something I've stripped for now, I really think that'd work better as a different page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Deku-shrub|Deku-shrub]] ([[User talk:Deku-shrub|talk]]) 13:06, 21 January 2016 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 19:07, 21 January 2016
Hey, so obviously I just rewrote a lot of where you were going with the page. I'm afraid I don't agree that there is a unified opposition of both genetically engineered foods and humans as a single movement. If anything this falls under general technoconservatism and neo-luddism, so we have the categories for this.
Opposition to human genetic engineering of course needs to be captured, to more broadly capture Proposed international ban on human genetic engineering for example. I hope you're okay with these changes
Additionally, I don't consider this as opposition to transhumanism in the food sense, only when we talk about people - something I've stripped for now, I really think that'd work better as a different page.
Deku-shrub (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2016 (CST)