Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
Hank suggests that the trademark could be used re-seize control of the party or for selfish financial gain.
 
Hank suggests that the trademark could be used re-seize control of the party or for selfish financial gain.
   −
Gennady and the US transhumanist party responded to these accusations with at statement in their FAQ<ref>http://transhumanist-party.org/faq/ explaining that party is a 'a non-monetary organization' and therefore ill-equipped to defend a trademark against legal challenges. He additionally explains that the US party retains sole custody of the key party infrastructures such as web site and member list.
+
Gennady and the US transhumanist party responded to these accusations with at statement in their FAQ<ref>http://transhumanist-party.org/faq/</ref> explaining that party is a 'a non-monetary organization' and therefore ill-equipped to defend a trademark against legal challenges. He additionally explains that the US party retains sole custody of the key party infrastructures such as web site and member list.
     

Navigation menu